Saturday, February 17, 2007

What makes a task authentic?

Review of Guariento & Morley (2001)

The quest of an authentic text is a familiar search for teachers of ELL students. Guariento and Morley summarize the ideas that an authentic text is an essential element of classes, and that the difficulty of finding such authentic texts is inherent within the teacher’s task. Texts that reflect, simulate or actually perform a task in the wider world are considered authentic. The difficulty of the texts must be considered, and careful modification of the difficulty level is possible without losing the essential authenticity. There is a danger that in oversimplification there is a loss that connection.

In a similar vein, authentic tasks are tasks that reflect, simulate or actually perform a task that serves a valid purpose within the wider world. There were four ways to consider tasks and whether they have what it takes to be authentic: 1) A genuine purpose, 2) a real world task, 3) the genuine task that is the learning process/classroom, 4) and then the consideration of individual students’ comprehension of the rationale behind each task (providing authentic motivation). While Guariento and Morley could not assure that all four of the considerations were relevant to each case where a teacher has to select tasks, knowing these considerations gives the teacher an opportunity to find an appropriate strategy (given each group of learners and subsequent revision of pedagogical strategy).

I am most interested the idea that students will find the classroom experience itself valid and authentic, as I am teaching older students. These students will be in a content sheltered class, so they will have achieved a level of functionality in the society that makes buying a train ticket seem quite pedestrian, I imagine. The authenticity struggles I anticipate encountering the most are ones where the kids are asked to reflect on the process of learning itself and upon the rationale for the learning. Then, a simplified (or scaffolded) reading of an American Literature text might lead to a role play, story, letter writing assignment, or other activity that would not be considered valid without the ability to draw on an older student’s world experiences to realize the authenticity of thinking and analyzing regardless of the actual activity.

3 comments:

Victoria Wreden Sadeq said...

Doug,

I am not very clear on what your trying to say in your last paragraph? Are you saying that teenagers are not interested in the curriculum of today or that you really want to reach them through your lesson plans? Or perhaps your stating both ideas?

It seems to me that an authentic task would be to survey your kids and find out what they are interested in and what's in your standard course of study a la multiple intelligences. Then find a middle ground. Is this what your stating in this last paragraph about authentic tasks?

Victoria

Dan said...

Content area teachers still have to worry about authentic tasks. This is not just the realm of ESL.

I see you concern, however, about "authenticity" in the English Literature classroom. All "good" literature, however, has a message that carries over into today's society. Weighing the messages in this literature again our own society is an authentic task in it's own right. Just imagine a newspaper editorial (or Mickey Rooney for that matter). These often juxtapose past literary topics with current issues.

Is that what you were getting at?

Dan

Dlillyda said...

Victoria and Dan-

I think my last paragraph comments on authenticity reflect my belief that studetns must have a wider world view in order to see the value in "good literature." I will have to be a guide sometimes to get them to realize that they have related concerns and philosophies to those espoused by the literature. An authentic task will also help them realize the importance of these issues in their lives. I worry that as the kids get older more subtlty in the texts make is harder to have them initially create the connections on their own.